Sarah Palin Pictures
The web is buzzing over John McCain’s running mate Sarah Palin. The democrats were flying high after their convention and McCain brings their publicity train to a screeching stop.
Many are considering Palin rather hot for a VP candidate. As you may know by now she was a beauty pageant contestant at one point.
I rather enjoyed Yahoo’s coverage of the event. “McCain is Tapping that VP”. You can’t make this stuff up.
and of course the photoshop
Here’s a picture of Sarah Palin looking hot as hell. I’m not sure if this is real or photoshop but it looks like a publicity photo for a bad 80’s erotic thriller. You know, the types of movie Shannon Tweed would have starred in.
Here’s a photo of Palin from her beauty pageant days.
12 Comments »
RSS feed for comments on this post
Hazel said,
September 5, 2008 @ 5:08 pm
you have got to be kidding me…this is some of the pics I have seen of her…everyone of the other one’s have a bottle of liquor in it somewhere. Is this who we want to possible lead our country if something happens to McCain?,,,
I am sure if these were pictures of Barack it would be a big fallout. She has no place in the white house…go OBAMA!!!!!!
Go Palin! said,
September 5, 2008 @ 10:18 pm
http://www.snopes.com/photos/politics/palin.asp
That photo of Palin’s head on someone else’s body (in the black mini skirt and heels) is a COMPLETE FAKE!
Don’t believe me? Check out Snopes.com … a website that debunks/verifies rumors
http://www.snopes.com/photos/politics/palin.asp
Africanus said,
September 6, 2008 @ 10:32 am
The miniskirt picture is photo shopped, only a moron lib democrat would fake pictures to discredit someone. Then again it takes a moron lib democrat falling for the fake pictures to then give commentary such as above. Any woman that looks hot in a mini skirt or ever touched alchohol cannot be president of the United States. We should send this Obama policy to NOW so they can make it clear to thier members.
Africanus said,
September 6, 2008 @ 10:33 am
The miniskirt picture is photo shopped, only a moron lib democrat would fake pictures to discredit someone. Then again it takes a falling for the fake pictures to then give commentary such as above. Any woman that looks hot in a mini skirt or ever touched alchohol cannot be president of the United States. We should send this Obama policy to NOW so they can make it clear to thier members.
bugsy said,
September 6, 2008 @ 6:16 pm
Ummm…Didn’t Obama smoke pot and snort coke?
Mike B said,
September 7, 2008 @ 9:13 pm
She is a complete babe. And a perfect strategic pick for VP. I am voting for McCain/Palin just to keep that closet muslim scum bag cocksucker out of the white house.
Stan Logan said,
September 8, 2008 @ 10:35 am
Hazel you are ignorant and shouldn’t be trying to read fake Blogs. Anyone who can’t discern fake photo’s from real photo’s shouldn’t post comments or write a Blog.
Anonymous said,
September 17, 2008 @ 2:37 pm
As anyone can see, these are clearly photo shopped. Look at how long her neck is in the mini-skirt photo. Go to snopes.com for the truth. This is someone’s desperate attempt to smear her name and change voter’s opinions. Or they are just having fun manipulating photos.
The internet is widely used and there are those who take advantage of innocent people who search the internet for information. Beware. Do you want more reliable information? Go to the bookstore and look at the book Obama wrote. In it he says that if he is in a situation to choose between the people of the U.S. and the Muslims, he would choose the Muslims. This is in plain black and white, printed in a book that Obama wrote, not some internet crap. Is that what we want in a leader of the United States of America?
Muldfeld said,
September 17, 2008 @ 11:42 pm
I can’t believe some of these comments. First, no one has said Obama did cocaine. There’s more evidence George W. Bush did cocaine than Obama. Second, Obama didn’t say he’d pick “the Muslims” over America; the book was written with an eye on political aspirations and, even if he did believe that, he wouldn’t say. Third, replace the word “Muslim” with Jew or Christian and you should realize how prejudice you sound. Do you right wingers have any conscience about the damage done by this kind of nationalistic, “my country right or wrong” thinking? Do you have any humility about what you’ve heaped on the world? How many more Muslims have suffered and died over the decades due to American policy in the Middle East?
Iran is a case in point of American hypocrisy. The US began interfering in the region to secure oil interests to the larger Middle East and prevent the Soviets from gaining anything. When a somewhat democratic Iranian government decided to give an oil concession to the USSR — in addition to already having been forced to grant one to US and UK oil companies — the CIA engineered a coup in 1953 to overthrow the Iranian government and impose the Shah of Iran; he was a weak monarch before, but the US elevated him and supported him financially in suppressing the people, torturing and brutalizing and murdering people for decades in the name of fighting “communists”; the US did the same throughout Latin America, by the way, especially in places like Guatemala, where Indios who shared the land were forced into indentured servitude by the US United Fruit Company. The only movement capable of overthrowing the Shah arose in 1979 with some Islamic fundamentalists who took some US hostages. However terrible it was, they were released alive. The Reagan administration reacts by funding Saddam Hussein in his 8-year war against Iran and supplies him with chemical weapons to do so — the very same “weapons of mass destruction” the US uses has an excuse to attack Iraq in 2003.
Still, Iran was moving forward and the very pro-American youth were making progress, however slowly. When 9/11 happened, a million Iranians took to the streets in Tehran in mourning and in support of America; I can’t think of that many proportionate numbers of Americans taking to the streets to mourn those of any nation, except Israel. The Bush administration, supported by the American people, gives his Axis of Evil speech threatening Iran needlessly. In the midst of the invasion of Iraq and the fears of the same happening to Iran, the Iranian leadership restricts election choices and the people select Ahmadinejad; he’s a bit of a fool in making some threats, but he’s done nothing. Iran decides to build up its nuclear program, and is perfectly within its rights to have a nuclear weapon because that’s the difference between how the US treated Iraq and how it treated North Korea. Don’t you get it? Iran is scared and there’s no reason to trust America to have that kind of monopoly on power when its people have behaved so ruthlessly. The Bush administration claims to care about Iraqis but there’s no evidence of this; he wouldn’t refuse to build permanent bases and made it so that the oil wouldn’t be ensured for Iraq’s future, but so American oil companies could come and profit from it. US tactics in Iraq are terroristic; thousands have died at the hands of the US military and private contractors like Blackwater and Haliburton. Do you even care?
If all you care about is America and want to keep blaming Muslims, then you’re no different from those who form Al Qaeda. They use terrorism, while your approach has killed millions across the world for decades to protect US economic interests. How is this moral. If we’re going to move toward peace, we must have leaders who understand that “the other” is just as capable of kindness and cruelty as we are and doesn’t just excuse American crimes because they’re by us and look for excuses to attack “the other”. Barack Obama is the most likely of the major candidates to do this. Palin still thinks the Vietnamese were evil to torture McCain, but wants to do the same to suspected “terrorists” (when most of those in Guantanamo Bay and Abu Graib are innocent), but she calls McCain heroic; this is hypocritical. McCain was dropping bombs and helping to kill millions of Vietnamese! Thousands still suffer from the birth defects from Agent Orange. The North Vietnamese were fighting to unite a Vietnam independent of US or French colonial rule; maybe it wasn’t the best form of government, but Ho Chi Minh had been begging for US aid for decades before.
This madness has to stop and, until you realize it, the rest of the world is going to keep hating the kinds of Americans that keep wanting to hurt others for their own selfish gain, using bogus claims of morality as an excuse.
RICK VREDENBURG said,
October 1, 2008 @ 10:38 am
YOUR ONE HOT MAMA. LIKE TO RUN YOU OUT TO MY OSTRICH RANCH AND MAKE A REAL WOMAN OUTTA YA. DAMM
MT said,
October 7, 2008 @ 4:18 pm
Hey, didn’t Bush snort coke and have an alcohol problem?
Isn’t he the one that Reagan referred to as a “drunk”?
What can you say about a man who can’t even run a baseball team, and trades away Sammy Sosa.
Why is it every time we get a Republican in office for more than 2 terms, the economy goes to hell?
Rick Vredenburg Mid Night Cowboy said,
October 18, 2008 @ 10:36 am
Im a thinkin old boy Bush is a still a using the old nose candy. I fer one think with Jeb Mcain in their with that hot Sarah weed never see either one of them.